Previous Next

Basin Futures Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin

List of tables and boxes

Table 3.1

Ecologically dependent functions, goods and services of rivers

Table 4.1

Summary of observations of climate change in the MDB

Table 4.2

Summary of future climate-change projections in the MDB

Table 4.3

Recent synthesis studies funded by the MDBA

Table 8.1

Perceptions of injustice in the NSW study

Table 8.2

Perceptions of injustice in the Victorian study

Table 8.3

Community injustice framework: some emerging themes from the NSW study

Table 15.1

Plan implementation elements with responsible party

Table 17.1

Trade attitudes by GMID and NSW Murray in 1998–99 (per cent)

Table 17.2

Trade attitudes in GMID in 2003–06 (per cent)

Table 17.3

Trade attitudes in GMID and Riverland in 2008–09 (per cent)

Table 17.4

Trade attitudes in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia, 2010–11 (per cent)

Table 18.1

Share of interception activities in consumptive water use and its impact on the cuts to diversions required for SDLs (per cent)

Table 18.2

Local environmental water needs and the contribution to downstream uses

Table 18.3

Rules governing inter-regional trade in the southern Murray

Table 18.4

Modelled and actual market prices over the period 1999–2009

Table 18.5

Expected market prices for water allocations, 2008 baseline, 3000 GL and 4000 GL SDL scenarios

Table 18.6

An example analysis of the economic impact of spring flows if reliability is accounted for

Table 23.1

Physical and institutional dimensions

Table 23.2

Comparative perspective on the Murray–Darling Basin from the western United States: scope for mutual learning

Table 25.1

Some of the main metaphors employed by Gittins in his article entitled: ‘Don’t think you can keep on neglecting me, Darling’

Table 26.1

Two sets of questions to investigate for collaborative water management

Table 26.2

Potential objectives, resources and decision-making phases that can impact on appropriate choice of methods and participants

Table 26.3

Common ‘less interactive’ and ‘more interactive’ stakeholder engagement methods with some of their properties

Table 26.4

Barriers to stakeholder engagement and collaborative approaches

Boxes

Box 26.1

Principles underpinning the MDBA’s approach to stakeholder engagement


Previous Next

Updated:  11 August 2026/ Responsible Officer:  / Page Contact: