Arentz, F. and H. Holzknecht. 1991. Evaluation of the Wokabaut Somil Training Programme: Report for the United Kingdom Foundation for the Peoples of the South Pacific. London: Forestry and Land Use Programme, International Institute for Environment and Development.
Barnett, T. 1992. Legal and administrative problems of forestry in Papua New Guinea. In Resources, Development and Politics in the Pacific Islands, ed. S. Henningham and R.J. May, 90–118. Bathurst: Crawford House Press.
Carson, G. 1974. A Report on Forestry and Forest Policy in Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Office of Forests.
Choi, N. 1999. Landowners to gain from World Bank funded forest project. The Independent, 11 November.
Downs, I. 1980. The Australian Trusteeship in Papua New Guinea 1945–1975. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Duncan, R. 1994. Melanesian forest sector study. International Development Issues 36. Canberra: Australian International Development Assistance Bureau (AIDAB).
Filer, C. 1997a. Key events relating to World Bank involvement in PNG forest policy reform process, 1988–98. In The Political Economy of Forest Management in Papua New Guinea, ed. C. Filer, 249–268. NRI Monograph 32. Boroko: The National Research Institute and London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Filer, C. 1997b. A statistical profile of Papua New Guinea’s log export industry. In The Political Economy of Forest Management in Papua New Guinea, ed. C. Filer, 207–248. NRI Monograph 32. Boroko: The National Research Institute and London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Filer, C. with N. Dubash and K. Kalit. 2000. The Thin Green Line. World Bank Leverage and Forest Policy Reform in Papua New Guinea. NRI Monograph 37. Boroko: The National Research Institute and Canberra: Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Project, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Holzknecht, H. 1997. Two sides of the coin: the case of forestry. In Compensation for Resource Development in Papua New Guinea, Law Reform Commission of Papua New Guinea, ed. S. Toft, 94–104, Monograph No. 6 and NCDS Pacific Policy Paper 24. Canberra: Resource Management in Asia-Pacific, and National Centre for Development Studies, Australian National University.
Holzknecht, H. 1999. Papua New Guinea’s rainforests: policy, practice, stakeholders and resource management. In Environment Papua New Guinea, ed. J. Rivers, F. L. Bein and P. Siaguru, 107–120. Collected Papers Series, Volume 1. Lae: Environmental Research and Management Centre, Papua New Guinea University of Technology and New Delhi: UBS Publishers' Distributors.
Kwa, E. 2000. Freezing customary land rights for forestry resources development projects. In Culture and Progress. The Melanesian Philosophy of Land and Development in Papua New Guinea, ed. N. Sullivan, 101–123. (Papers from the Divine Word June 2001 PNG Land Symposium). Madang: Divine Word University Press.
Louman, B. and S. Nicholls. 1995. Forestry in Papua New Guinea. In PNG Country Study on Biological Diversity, ed. N. Sekhran and S. Miller. Waigani: Department of Environment and Conservation, and Nairobi: Africa Centre for Resources and Environment.
Papua New Guinea. 1991. National Forest Policy. Hohola: Papua New Guinea Ministry of Forests.
Papua New Guinea. 1999. 2000 Budget Papers — Volume 2, Part 3: 2000 Estimates of Development Expenditure for National Departments, Statutory Authorities and Provincial Governments. Port Moresby: Ministry of Finance and Treasury.
Taylor, R. 1997. The state versus custom: regulating Papua New Guinea’s timber industry. In The Political Economy of Forest Management in Papua New Guinea, ed. C. Filer, 249–268. NRI Monograph 32. Boroko: The National Research Institute and London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Wood, M. 1997. The Makapa Timber Rights Purchase: a study in project failure in the post-Barnett era. In The Political Economy of Forest Management in Papua New Guinea, ed. C. Filer, 84–108. NRI Monograph 32. Boroko: The National Research Institute and London: International Institute for Environment and Development.